Australia already possesses many of the institutional building blocks for a coordinated approach to place-based innovation. CSIRO, the National Reconstruction Fund, the Industry Capability Network, and the Net Zero Economy Authority all operate with distinct mandates and capabilities. The challenge is whether they can be aligned for shared regional and sectoral objectives. This Insight examines how coordination across these institutions could reshape innovation ecosystems and

Australia possesses many of the institutional ingredients needed for effective innovation ecosystem development. What remains largely absent is coordination across these instruments around shared, place-based objectives. This Innovation Insight examines the governance challenge through comparisons with the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Finland, Singapore, and New Zealand, and asks what kind of institutional mechanism Australia requires to align innovation, research, and in

The launch of the National Innovation and Science Agenda (NISA) in 2015 marked a watershed moment for Australian policy, placing entrepreneurship at the centre of the nation's economic future. This analysis looks at how NISA's initiatives, particularly the overhaul of the Venture Capital Limited Partnership (VCLP) and Early-Stage Venture Capital Limited Partnership (ESVCLP) regimes, successfully stimulated the early-stage funding ecosystem. It also discusses the critical chal

Australia’s innovation system is world-class in research inputs,but falters when it comes to commercial outcomes. This is our long-standing "innovation paradox." What if we could finally solve it? Drawing on the case of Kaiserslautern, a small German city transformed into a global tech hub through the establishment of Fraunhofer Institutes, this Insight makes the case for introducing Fraunhofer-style applied research institutes in Australia.