How should governments engage with innovation ecosystems? Research by the Acton Institute, examining over 90 innovation districts globally, finds no governance model that reliably outperforms others. What matters is whether arrangements align with local institutional foundations and address each ecosystem's binding constraint, the weakest capability that limits returns from all other investment. This Insight catalogues twelve governance categories from Silicon Valley to Singa

People regularly ask whether innovation districts can be deliberately created or whether they emerge beyond policy control. This Insight argues that districts arise through a small number of recurring pathways rather than a single replicable model. Drawing on international experience, it shows why policy outcomes depend less on ambition than on correctly diagnosing which pathway is plausible in a given context. Replicating the Silicon Valley or China approaches is fraught.

In research policy, the "Valley of Death" is a familiar lament. We assume that with enough tax credits or grant schemes, the bridge from discovery to market will build itself. Yet beneath the surface lies a more fundamental disconnect: the tension between what we can see as the "sociology of the academy" and the "epistemology of the engineer".